[IPOL discuss] comments needed : [draft] IPOL Software Guidelines v.1

[Nicolas Limare]

Hi,

Because of recent misunderstandings on the meaning of the IPOL source
code requirements, and other things I wanted to correct, I wrote
a first draft of the IPOL Software Guidelines, version 1.

-> http://tools.ipol.im/wiki/author/code/software_guidelines/

This document incorporates, extends and will replace the current
Implementation Manual and Copyright and Patent Policy.
-> http://www.ipol.im/meta/submission/manual/#implementation
-> http://tools.ipol.im/wiki/author/code/copyright_and_patents/

It should describe all the requirements an IPOL software must fullfill
to be acceptable for IPOL.

Now I need your comments, to correct and improve this draft and obtain
an official version. Please post your comments on this list, I will
prepare a second draft after 2 weeks. I am interested in any comment,
but particularly in
* imprecisions and ambiguity
* disagreements about a requirement/recommandation
* ununderstandable requirement/recommendation
* requirements hard to attain for some of the authors or algorithms
* proofreading by native English speakers

PS: read and check the guidelines, because once it is they are adopted
you will have to follow them!

-- 
Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan    http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/~limare/
IPOL - image processing on line                          http://www.ipol.im/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20111106/15518928/attachment.pgp>