[IPOL discuss] proposed redesign of www.ipol.im

[Simon Loic]

Hi!

For me as well everything looks fine (chrome ubunutu).
BTW I prefer the new theme.

It makes me think that we discussed with Jean-Michel (some times in the
past) the possibility to have a separate tab for the code:
In this tab we could have a link to a tarball of the peer reviewed code,
but we could also add some additional release and optionally a git url. It
would of course be important to make a clear distinction between
This would allow to keep track of evolutions such as
improvements/corrections/change of API in the code.

Apologies for the change of subject.

--
Loïc


On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Miguel Colom <
Miguel.Colom at cmla.ens-cachan.fr> wrote:

> Hi,
> I've test it with Firefox, Epiphany and Chromium and the pages are
> rendered correctly.
>
> I like the new design.
> Miguel
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >> I am especially interested if wou think something looks weird, with a
> >> bad size, color or placement. In that case, please send me a
> >> screenshot showing the problem.
> >
> > everything looks fine in my browsers (Safari and Chrome, macOSX Lion
> > versions)
> >
> > José Luis
> >
> >
> > El 12/03/2012, a las 13:45, Nicolas Limare escribió:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here is a proposition to "refresh" the appearance of the IPOL website:
> >>
> >>    http://dev.ipol.im/~nil/tmp/ipol/style2e/
> >>
> >> Only the appearance of the website is modified, the content and
> >> structure are unchanged so far. This example only works for four
> >> pages: the main page, and the article/demo/archive pages for the first
> >> article (DCT image denoising). Every other link will send you back to
> >> the current website.
> >>
> >> The main changes are:
> >> * less colors, simple design (for future PDF integration)
> >> * journal title and menu with essential links on every page
> >> * use the IPOL logo and color theme
> >> * smaller article metadata information
> >> * pop-up BibTeX
> >>
> >> I would like to have your impressions on this design. I tested it on
> >> all the Linux and Windows browsers I could get, the appearance seems
> >> consistent. The attached screenshot shows the expected rendering of
> >> these four pages, as obtained on my browser.
> >>
> >> I am especially interested if wou think something looks weird, with a
> >> bad size, color or placement. In that case, please send me a
> >> screenshot showing the problem.
> >>
> >> For other propositions, as I am not a web designer, please provide an
> >> example if you want to suggest something more complex than a color
> >> or size correction.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan
> >> http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/~limare/
> >> IPOL - image processing on line
> >> http://www.ipol.im/
> >> <ipol_style2e.png>_______________________________________________
> >> discuss mailing list
> >> discuss at list.ipol.im
> >> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > discuss at list.ipol.im
> > http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20120312/28b73351/attachment.html>