[IPOL discuss] publishing the LaTeX source of IPOL articles?
Daniel Kondermann
daniel.kondermann at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Wed Mar 27 10:38:49 CET 2013
I think the basic idea is very nice, but plagiarism will be difficult to control.
What about adding a "Request Latex-Sources"-Link with a text-box "Reason" (or so) and authors can decide for each occasion?
I don't think there will be many requests and if so, the policy can be changed later appropriately.
Spam can be a problem here, so a re-captcha might be necessary (easy to add and can also be added later).
Best,
Daniel
Am 27.03.2013 07:56, schrieb Jean-Michel Morel:
> Dear all,
>
> I may confess that I am scared by this idea, because I see plagerism
> booming in the submissions
> to journals. Authors, particularly in Asia, don't copy just the text;
> they copy figures, tables, experiments, and republish again with
> different author names in other journals.
>
> Best,
> Jean-Michel
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Nicolas Limare
> <nicolas.limare at cmla.ens-cachan.fr> wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> What do you think about publishing the LaTeX source of IPOL articles
>> on ipol.im, for example as supplementary materials? I see a few
>> benefits:
>> * these are good examples to write new IPOL articles
>> * recoding comnplex math formula in LaTeX takes time and is not
>> interesting, copy-paste is faster
>> * same for bibliographix references
>> * accessing the original image files to re-use for comparison is
>> better than trying to extract them from the PDF
>>
>> Moreover, some people in a conference recently attended by Carlo say
>> they want to be able to regenerate article files in other formats than
>> the PDF provided by the publisher.
>>
>> For the intellectual rights, a LaTeX source is a program, we could
>> suggest a template to the authors to mention their copyright and a
>> license.
>>
>> What do you think about this idea?
>>
>> --
>> Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan http://limare.perso.math.cnrs.fr/
>> IPOL journal http://www.ipol.im/
>> -> image processing, reproducible research, open science
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at list.ipol.im
>> https://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> https://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 553 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20130327/2f05e69d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the discuss
mailing list