[IPOL discuss] Corrections of erratas: the Scholarpedia method

[Nicolas Limare]

Hi,

Mauricio suggested we have a look at Scholarpedia, who faced similar
issues.
-> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Scholarpedia

Scholarpedia is, inspired by Wikipedia, a wiki-based encyclopedia
written and peer-reviewed by "scholars". By some aspects it is similar
to IPOL, without the software component and image processing focus.
Their policy is that the (main) author of an article becomes its
curator after the reviewed approval, and can modify the article or
approve modifications by others.

Upon approval, articles are archived in a journal with ISSN and
DOI. The wiki structure of Scholarpedia allows to keep forever the
full history of articles, and all the revisions are always available,
as required by the MathReviews Policy presented in my previous mail.

One can also notice that Scholarpedia is published as HTML, and uses
MathJax to render math formulas. I find the result readable, somehow
better than the formulads on IPOL, but inferior to a PDF produces with
LaTeX.
-> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Galerkin_methods

-- 
Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan    http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/~limare/
IPOL - image processing on line                          http://www.ipol.im/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20111209/ba999515/attachment.pgp>