[IPOL discuss] Corrections of erratas: the Scholarpedia method

[Juan Cardelino]

> One can also notice that Scholarpedia is published as HTML, and uses
> MathJax to render math formulas. I find the result readable, somehow
> better than the formulads on IPOL, but inferior to a PDF produces with
> LaTeX.
> -> http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Galerkin_methods
>

Two small comments: first, scholarpedia is down, and it doesn't show
in google's cache; second, we can use the input format as latex, keep
the online format as html with mathjax or whatever, and a download
link for the PDF for printing and offline use. As a user, I would pay
the price of a slightly worse math rendering, in exchange for the
agility that a quick look a the web gives. In addition, the
integration of media in the web page is better. And finally, math
rendering is steadly improving, so it is just a matter of time to have
a decent converter.