[IPOL discuss] citations in IPOL articles
Daniel Kondermann
daniel.kondermann at iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Fri Jan 28 16:52:53 CET 2011
From my point of view it would most certainly be the best way to simply
use bibtex-style references and a cite-tag in the markup.
Things brings us back to the question about the requirements and choice
of a content managament system.
I am currently trying to find a sustainable way to develop the
web-interface. As I understood up to now, there are basically three
"systems"
Demo Frontend (HTML+Ajax, Java, ...?)
Demo Backend (Python-based code)
Article CMS (IkiWiki)
I suggest to leave the Demo part as it is right now and would like to
discuss the choice for content management.
Therefore, I would ask you to comment on the requirements first in order
to try to make a "bias-free" decision in terms of prior knowledge how to
use the system. Next step would be to "bias" these results by looking at
who knows how much about each system and would dare to take some
responsibility there.
Can somebody reiterate the list of possible system choices and the one
containing the long-term requirements?
Best,
Daniel
Am 28.01.2011 12:19, schrieb Pascal Getreuer:
> I have a question: is there a good way to include citations in IPOL articles?
>
> I have found a method for doing this, but it is rather ugly. Here is
> an example:
>
> "# References
> 1. Historic paper
> 2. Another paper
>
> ...
>
> The proof of this result can be found in <a href="#index2h1">[1]</a>."
>
> The link makes the citation "[1]" clickable (similar to what LaTeX
> hyperref does). The "index2h1" happens to be the name field of the
> References header, which I found by looking at the HTML generated by
> IkiWiki.
>
> A downside of this approach is that citations are enumerated manually,
> which makes it difficult and error-prone to reorder them. A second
> potential problem is with the internal link "index2h1," I am assuming
> that IkiWiki will generate that name for the References header, rather
> than specifying this name myself.
>
> Is there a better way to do this?
>
> Thanks,
> Pascal
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 552 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20110128/e85d93ef/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the discuss
mailing list