[IPOL discuss] Corrections of erratas in IPOL articles

[Jean-Michel Morel]

Dear all,

Several recent occurrences indicate the convenience of correcting errata 
or making minor amendments in IPOL papers, code, archive and online demo.

Thus, I submit to you the following rules:

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
-IPOL web page settings for articles, demo and archive can be modified 
by the editorial board;

-items of the public archive of each article can be removed by the 
editorial board (reasons: size, inadequate content, user requests);

-demo changes by the authors or editors concerning the presentation of 
results, the parameter ranges, etc. which do not change the code are 
authorized. Nevertheless, since they may alter the meaning of the 
article, they should be approved by a competent editor and by all 
authors of the article.

-Code corrections can be authorized, if the necessity or utility of the 
changes is explained, and provided the  code continues doing exactly 
what the article says it does. Such corrections must therefore be 
approved by editor, or editor+referee (and by all authors).

-the article itself can also be corrected provided the corrections are 
approved by editor, or editor+referee (and by all authors).

For each article or code correction, identifiable "Errata" paragraphs 
should be inserted or appended in  the article or code and in its 
"readme",  giving the exact correction (text before text after), its 
date, and by whom it was approved.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Please, let me know if you see any serious inconvenience in these rules.
Thank you for any correction for this text too.

Best,
Jean-Michel





Nicolas Limare a écrit :
> Jean-Michel,
> 
> Mauricio noted a small error in the references of the retinex article;
> his mail is copied after my message.
> 
> What should we do in this situation? Correct the article or not? I
> think we should only modify the articles (including the software) when
> we _have to_, ie for license, copyright, patent or plagiary
> reasons. If you agree, maybe this should be added to the authors info
> page http://www.ipol.im/meta/submission/.
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Mauricio Delbracio <mdelbra at gmail.com> -----
> 
> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:53:26 +0100
> From: Mauricio Delbracio <mdelbra at gmail.com>
> To: nicolas.limare at cmla.ens-cachan.fr
> Subject: mistake in one reference Retinex-Poisson IPOL
> 
> salut nicolas,
> 
> I found a very small mistake in one of the articles being cited from
> your IPOL article
> 
> "Retinex Poisson Equation: a Model for Color Perception".
> 
> The third reference:
> 
> P. Pérez, M. Gangnet and A. Blake, Poisson Image Editing. ACM
> Transactions on Image Processing. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, vol 22,
> Issue 3 Pages: 313 - 318 (July 2003). DOI:10.1145/882262.882269
> 
> Should be
> 
> P. Pérez, M. Gangnet and A. Blake, Poisson Image Editing. ACM
> Transactions on Graphics. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, vol 22, Issue 3
> Pages: 313 - 318 (July 2003). DOI:10.1145/882262.882269
> 
> "ACM Transactions on Image Processing" --> "ACM Transactions on
> Graphics". (the first journal doesn't exist).
> 
> a+
> m
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>