[IPOL discuss] MATLAB demos
Luis Alvarez
lalvarez at dis.ulpgc.es
Tue Jun 2 11:00:48 CEST 2015
Dear all,
The main challenge we face at the current moment is to increase the
number of papers and the number of new authors who send papers to IPOL.
The current IPOL paper publication statistic is :
2011 : 21 papers
2012: 15 papers
2013: 16 papers
2014: 21 papers
2015: 3 papers (up to now)
To improve these figures is mandatory if we want to consolidate IPOL as
an international journal and to submit IPOL to the JCR and SCOPUS
Journal database evaluation. Otherwise, in my opinion, there is a high
risk that IPOL becomes irrelevant or even disappears. In this regards I
think that to accept new languages as Matlab (which is used by a large
community) could be an important step in this direction. Of course it
would be nice that the Matlab code be compatible with Octave but I think
that such compatibility should not be mandatory, it should be written as
a recommendation. Please do not forget that currently, to send a paper
to IPOL for somebody who is not familiar with the "IPOL Community" is a
quite complex task. To encourage new authors to send papers to IPOL we
have to ease the paper edition procedure and to clearly differentiate
recommendations from mandatory conditions which should be reduced as
much as possible.
Regards
Luis Alvarez
> Dear Miguel,
>
> Exactly, my suggestion is basically to allow only Matlab toolboxes that
> have the same signature and behavior as those available on Octave-Forge.
> More precisely, since all functions of a given Matlab toolbox may not
> be implemented in the corresponding Octave-Forge package, I mean to
> allow only functions implemented in Octave-Forge that give the same
> results than the ones in Matlab toolboxes.
>
> I believe that this compatibility may be checked almost automatically at
> the editing step by checking that the source code gives the same outputs
> (within a given numerical accuracy) running on Octave.
>
> I agree that this compatibility requirement would add a bit of work for
> authors and editors, but it would be a "political" statement in favor of
> free and open source softwares and it would not disadvantage labs that
> do not have Matlab license (which is rather frequent outside the US and
> elsewhere, outside major labs).
>
> Best,
> Jacques.
>
> Jacques Froment (Jacques.Froment at univ-ubs.fr)
>
> Université de Bretagne Sud - LMBA UMR 6205
> Centre Y. Coppens, campus de Tohannic
> BP 573, F-56017 VANNES, FRANCE
> Tél. 0297017138 (+33 297017138)
> Fax 0297017175 (+33 297017175)
>
> On 01/06/2015 20:19, Miguel Colom wrote:
>> Quoting Jacques Froment <Jacques.Froment at univ-ubs.fr>:
>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I am very reserved about the possibilities of publishing a code
>>> that needs a commercial software. Would it be possible to request
>>> the source code to be also compatible with the free GNU Octave
>>> software ? (as Octave treats incompatibility with Matlab as a bug,
>>> the main impact would be a limitation of usable functions from Matlab
>>> toolboxes).
>>
>> Dear Jacques,
>> We haven't finished writing the guidelines for MATLAB submissions and
>> therefore we're open to any kind of suggestions.
>>
>> About forcing compatibility to Octave, I think that will depend on if
>> the toolboxes that we'll allow have the same
>> signature and behavior as in Matlab. If not, then we can't ask it.
>>
>> But as I say, the rules haven't been already fixed.
>>
>> Best,
>> Miguel
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Jacques.
>>>
>>> Jacques Froment (Jacques.Froment at univ-ubs.fr)
>>>
>>> Université de Bretagne Sud - LMBA UMR 6205
>>> Centre Y. Coppens, campus de Tohannic
>>> BP 573, F-56017 VANNES, FRANCE
>>> Tél. 0297017138 (+33 297017138)
>>> Fax 0297017175 (+33 297017175)
>>>
>>> On 01/06/2015 15:10, Miguel Colom wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>> IPOL is accepting MATLAB demos now.
>>>>
>>>> We're working on writing clear guidelines for the MATLAB source
>>>> codes (accepted toolboxes, style, etc) but meanwhile
>>>> it's already possible to submit MATLAB codes and demos for
>>>> publication.
>>>>
>>>> This message is only to explain what to do to have a demo executing
>>>> MATLAB.
>>>>
>>>> The MATLAB code must be compiled. This step is exactly the same as
>>>> what we do for any other compiled language and to do
>>>> it it suffices to write a Makefile which calls mcc (the MATLAB
>>>> compiler).
>>>>
>>>> For example:
>>>> PROG=gauss
>>>> all:
>>>> mcc -m ${PROG}.m -a lib -R -nodisplay
>>>>
>>>> The generated binary must be moved to the "bin" directory, as usual.
>>>>
>>>> The compiler generates not only the binary, but also a BASH script
>>>> which calls the binary within the proper environment.
>>>> You don't need to care about what the script does. Think of it as a
>>>> black box where you put your parameters and it
>>>> executes your program.
>>>>
>>>> The script needs the following parameters, in this order:
>>>> 1) The MATLAB path
>>>> 2) The parameters of your algorithm.
>>>>
>>>> The MATLAB path can be obtained from the demo system configuration,
>>>> by calling self.get_MATLAB_path().
>>>>
>>>> For example:
>>>> p = self.run_proc(['run_gauss.sh', self.get_MATLAB_path(),
>>>> 'input_0.png',
>>>> 'output_1.png', str(sigma)])
>>>>
>>>> You need also to configure the path of MATLAB with two new entries
>>>> in demo.conf.
>>>> In the production server the configuration is:
>>>>
>>>> # demo paths
>>>> demo.extra_path = '/usr/bin:/bin:/wheezy/usr/local/MATLAB'
>>>> demo.matlab_path = '/wheezy/usr/local/MATLAB'
>>>>
>>>> You need to put there the right paths corresponding to your MATLAB
>>>> installation.
>>>>
>>>> And you need also to have an updated version of the demo system.
>>>> You can download a copy with: git clone
>>>> https://github.com/mcolom/ipolDevel.git
>>>> In principle you only need to change the contents of the "lib"
>>>> directory.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>> Miguel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
>>>>
>>>> contact edit at ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
>>>> news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
>>>> announces announce at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
>>>> discussions discuss at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
>>> --
>>> IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
>>>
>>> contact edit at ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
>>> news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
>>> announces announce at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
>>> discussions discuss at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
>>
>> contact edit at ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
>> news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
>> announces announce at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
>> discussions discuss at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
> --
> IPOL - Image Processing On Line - http://ipol.im/
>
> contact edit at ipol.im - http://www.ipol.im/meta/contact/
> news+feeds twitter @IPOL_journal - http://www.ipol.im/meta/feeds/
> announces announce at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/announce/
> discussions discuss at list.ipol.im - http://tools.ipol.im/mm/discuss/
More information about the discuss
mailing list