[IPOL discuss] Anonymous demos?

[José Lezama]

There is another side of the story which is that with a website you
could track the visitors and figure out where the reviewers are from.
This is a reason why they usually don't accept websites in
double-blind reviews.

For these cases a solution may be to put a disclaimer saying that the
author has absolutely no access to the site statistics.

Regards,

José

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:40 PM, rafael grompone von gioi
<grompone at gmail.com> wrote:
> If I put a demo on my user account at the dev server,
> it is easy to know it is me. We could create an anonymous
> user for this, but someone should verify that it is really
> anonymous. I imagine that no program-chair will now
> take the trouble or the risk of verifying that it is really
> anonymous.
>
> However, IPOL could create and make public
> a way of building anonymous demos, and in that
> case it may start to be authorised at conferences.
>
> rafael
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Jean-Michel Morel
> <Jean-Michel.Morel at cmla.ens-cachan.fr> wrote:
>> I do not see the problem. Can't you simply replace the authors names in  the
>> text by "Anonymous"?
>>
>> Jean-Michel
>>
>>
>> rafael grompone von gioi a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I recently submitted a paper to double-blind peer-reviewed
>>> conference. I wanted to provide a link to an IPOL demo,
>>> but the program-chairs said it wasn't allowed as that would
>>> violate anonymity.
>>>
>>> Should we think a way of providing anonymous demos?
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> rafael
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> discuss mailing list
>>> discuss at list.ipol.im
>>> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at list.ipol.im
>> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss