[IPOL discuss] revision of the Software Guidelines - third draft 1.01c

Miguel Colom Miguel.Colom at cmla.ens-cachan.fr
Fri Sep 28 15:28:44 CEST 2012


Hi,
I think there's a small errata in the guidelines, at the line where it
says that the "readme" file should specify a "list of the files of
included".

It should be "A list of included files to be reviewed" or similar.

Miguel

> Hi,
>
>>> I would like to suggest a few updates to the current IPOL software
>>> guidelines. My first draft is available online:
>>> -> https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/ref/software_guidelines/drafts/
>>>
>>> I will collect all these remarks and propose a second draft after
>>> two weeks.
>>
>> I'm a little late, but the second draft (1.01b) is online:
>> -> https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/ref/software_guidelines/drafts/
>>
>> As usual, send your comments, and I will use them for the next draft
>> version, expected Sept. 23.
>
> I received no comment about these guidelines, so the third and
> probably final draft version (1.01c) is online:
> https://tools.ipol.im/wiki/ref/software_guidelines/drafts/
>
> The only changes from the previous drafts are minor changes in a few
> sentences. If I receive no comment about these guidelines before
> Monday October 7th, I'll consider they are approved, and I'll ask the
> feedback of the editorial board before the final adoption.
>
> For info, a summary of the changes from the current version of the
> guidelines (1.00) is copied hereafter.
>
> All the best,
>
> 8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------8<----------
>
> Changes from version 1.00:
>
> * Add a license for this document.
> * Remove some mentions of IPOL, for generic guidelines.
> * Only mention the standard names for the C/C++ dialects; update the
>   links.
> * Recommend a compilation without warnings.
> * Mention GPU-accelerated computing.
> * Require ifdef macros for OpenMP.
> * Clarify the use of external libraries packaged with the software
>   (support code).
> * Recommend additional compiler variables for make.
> * Require correct exit codes and robust command-line processing.
> * Add the CC0 dedication to the list of possible license terms.
> * Require a list of the files and known defects in README.txt; allow the
>   README.txt file to be split.
> * Fix some typos, rephrase some sentences.
>
> --
> Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan
> http://limare.perso.math.cnrs.fr/
> IPOL - image processing on line
> http://www.ipol.im/
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> https://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss



More information about the discuss mailing list