[IPOL discuss] IPOL on windows

[Pierre Moulon]

Do we could imagine a git repository for each publication to receive update
in time ?

I want to say the publication comes with a basic code. The one that was
accepted.
And an additional link to a git repository to receive code update
(compilation fixes, code fixes, additional comment,  documentation)
 => Like the fork on github...

-> The validated publication have his code in the master trunk (with to
archive functionality to have the same as today with code download)
-> A fork branches receive the modification from the community

Pierre.

2011/10/4 Nicolas Limare <nicolas.limare at cmla.ens-cachan.fr>

> > I think it is nice to accept contributions of third parties, not only
> > authors.
>
> When I publish an article in IPOL, I wouldn't want anyone else to
> modify it while keeping my name as the author. This also is a
> copyright issue: you can't present your work as being mine.
> The base rule is "once published, an article doesn't change". That's
> how any journal work, and without this rule we can't trust the journal
> because the article will include some unreviewed material.
>
> And we need to know what are talking about. When someone cites "the
> IPOL code for the Foobar algorithm", it has to clearly point to one
> given version of the code without any ambiguity.
>
> Minimal changes can be accepted as an axception to the rule, for
> example fo fix a serious bug or a copyright issue (this already
> happened in IPOL), but the changes must be very detailed, and a note
> from the editor systematically added to the article.
>
> But IPOL is not the place where the a code will live and be improved
> and updated. IPOL is a place where one given version of the code is
> reviewed and published.
>
> > Lets say I take the time to donwload and compile it on
> > windows, it would be nice to give back the experience, in the form of
> > instructions, cmake or whatever.
>
> Do it in the wiki. It's a free space for this purpose, without
> editorial restrictions.
>
> > I don't wan't to increase the burden of the authors, which is very big
> > at the moment.
>
> Yes, I agree. But in the wiki (or anywhere else), not in the published
> articles. Or it could be in a forum attached to every article, if
> someone designs and installs these forums.
>
> --
> Nicolas LIMARE - CMLA - ENS Cachan
> http://www.cmla.ens-cachan.fr/~limare/
> IPOL - image processing on line
> http://www.ipol.im/
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6LDgUACgkQvviFAPpCP08baQCfZ7cqnosHP0GruZMj362+IXOS
> RmUAn2R2vDzKcxPklZViZf2YtH9iGkRY
> =pel6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at list.ipol.im
> http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tools.ipol.im/mailman/archive/discuss/attachments/20111004/54d61ff3/attachment.html>